On 21/02/12 12:12, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 02/21/2012 11:27 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
scope/scoped isn't broken, they're just not safe. It's better to have an
unsafe library feature than an unsafe language feature.
scope is broken because it is not enforced by the means of
flow-analysis. As a result, it is not safe. Copying it to the library
and temporarily disabling 'scope' for classes is a good move however,
because this means we will be able to fix it at an arbitrary point in
the future without additional code breakage.
Does the library solution actually work the same as the language solution?
