On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:44:23 +0100, James Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
On 29 February 2012 19:30, simendsjo <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:03:30 +0100, Mike Parker <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 2/29/2012 1:10 AM, simendsjo wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:58:13 +0100, Trass3r <[email protected]> wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5570
Thanks. I've literally spent hours testing various things without any
luck - would have been simpler if I knew asm :/
A blocker for using x64 on linux then.
Have you tested on 32-bit yet? I had the exact same problem with one
of my
wrappers when passing a struct by value, but on 32-bit Windows.
Luckily, in
my case it was simple enough to implement the function in D to work
around
it. I'm curious to know if it's related.
Yes. Tested on x32, and it works just fine. I'll use ia32libs and -m32
for
the time being then.
A strange thing is that memory consumption went _up_ when everything was
compiled as x32.
I don't know much, but wouldn't bigger register sizes mean that less
data needs shuffled in and out of memory? Resulting in less
instructions and therefore less memory usage?
I'm just guessing though
--
James Miller
Probably. Almost everything is done using structs right now. Guess it will
be quite different when I get a lot of classes bouncing around.
