On 3/9/12, Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah I understood it as a general concept as well. Probably many > people did. Why doesn't Andrei chime in? >
Btw, we all know how much Andrei loves generics so why the heck would he care about arrays so much to only give them special properties? I'm almost 100% sure he meant UFCS to be available for all types. And if not, I bet he wouldn't second-guess this feature. IOW I think Jonathan is just being pedantic about wording.
