"Timon Gehr" <timon.g...@gmx.ch> wrote in message news:jjokc7$t3j$1...@digitalmars.com... > On 03/13/2012 11:29 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: >> I'm reading through D's grammar spec, and maybe it's just not enough >> sleep >> or some such, but my brain is turning to mud: >> >> Is there a simple operator precidence chart somewhere? > > > I don't think there is, but I think I can create one: >
Thanks! > == != > < >= <= \ // 9 relational operators > !> !< !>= !<= <>\ > !<> <>= !<>= in \ > !in is !is > & // 10 bitwise AND (ambiguous with 9) > ^ // 11 bitwise XOR (ambiguous with 9) > | // 12 bitwise OR (ambiguous with 9) Ah, see, that's what I was tripping up on. I thought there seemed to be something slightly odd going on with those (and then from there I started second-guessing everything). It seemed almost like these had both ordered priorities *and* the same priority. So how exactly does this part work then? > >> (Also, for >> associativity: Assign and OpAssign are right-associative and everything >> else >> is left-associative, correct?) >> >> > > Power is right-associative too. Oh that's right. I keep forgetting we have that now.
