On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Piotr Szturmaj <bncr...@jadamspam.pl> wrote: > Andrej Mitrovic wrote: >> >> On 12/1/11, Kai Meyer<k...@unixlords.com> wrote: >>> >>> I'm finding std.json extremely well written, with one glaring exception. >> >> >> I'm finding it to be crap. The last time I used it I just kept getting >> access violations (or was that std.xml? They're both crap when I used >> them.). ae.json beats its pants off for its simplicity + you get >> toJson/jsonParse for serialization and a way to skip serializing >> fields since a recent commit . It's easy to write your own >> tree-walking routines as well. >> >> But whatever works for people. :) > > > I have written streaming json parser using ranges. It returns slices when > possible. Benchmarked it and it's about 2.05x the speed of std.json. > > It gives possibility to "dig" into the structure and stream (using ranges) > by member fields, array elements, or characters of field names and string > values. It's possible to parse JSON without a single allocation. For > convenience, one can get objects, arrays and strings as a whole. > > I plan to add a streaming json writer and release it (currently it outputs > json using toString()). I've seen questions on stackoverflow about parsing > 500 MB JSON... so streaming feature makes it really universal. This approach > should be good for XML parser too. > > Currently, I don't have time to improve it. But if someone is interested I > can send it as is :-)
I'm very interested in your json lib. I just started writing my own but you have more advanced stuff already so I'd better build something on top of your work. Is it on a repository somewhere on the web?