On Friday, 20 April 2012 at 18:47:14 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 20.04.2012 19:14, Xan wrote:
On Friday, 20 April 2012 at 14:18:37 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
On 20.04.2012 18:10, Xan wrote:
What fails if I want to define this:
Algorisme!(T,V) opBinary(string op)(Algorisme!(T,U) alg) {
Algorisme!(T,V) opBinary(string op, T)(Algorisme!(T,U) alg) {
You need to name what T is and that is *sometype*. Anyway I
suggest
getting a decent book (TDPL).
if (op=="*") {
static if is conceptually and technically better here.
Thanks, Dmitry, for your suggestions, but it does not work too:
$ gdmd-4.6 algorisme
algorisme.d:54: Error: 'alg' is not of arithmetic type, it is a
algorisme.Algorisme!(int,int).Algorisme
algorisme.d:54: Error: 'alg2' is not of arithmetic type, it is
a
algorisme.Algorisme!(int,int).Algorisme
I update de gist: https://gist.github.com/2429005
By the other hand, is there any way to put the definition of
operator *
in the class (not out like I have now)?
it should be inside the class. Why would you put it outside and
hope it work? What 'this' can refer to in free function?
Yes, you're wright. So in.
But what fails?
I reveice these errors and I have no idea what fails!
Please read spec at the very least.
http://dlang.org/operatoroverloading.html
I read it. It served me as guide. But not I'm in trouble....
Can you help me fixing the bug!
Regards,
Xan.
Thanks,
Xan.
