On 02.06.2012 14:39, Kevin Cox wrote:
On Jun 2, 2012 6:38 AM, "bearophile" <bearophileh...@lycos.com <mailto:bearophileh...@lycos.com>> wrote: > > Jonathan M Davis: > > >> Personally, I wish that it weren't legal to call a static function with an >> object and that you had to explicitly use the class, > > > I agree. > > Bye, > bearophile Same here, D 3.0?
Just rename the function. In contrast it is not easy to code up a workaround that will "re-enable" static as instance method back if we to ban it. Generic programming benefits from it in certain scenarios, while I personally wouldn't mind either way.
-- Dmitry Olshansky
