On Monday, June 25, 2012 08:24:59 Namespace wrote: > > Wait, you have a template mixin inside of Foo which passes Foo > > to it? I don't > > know if you can get away with that or not, since you're trying > > to pass a type > > to a template while you're adding stuff to it via that > > template. So, the type > > is incomplete. I'm willing to be that that's your problem, but > > I don't know. > > > > - Jonathan M Davis > > If so, the problem would have to solved if i switch from a mixin > to an abstract class. Or not? > Or have you any other idea?
If you don't need to use any compile-time reflection on the type itself (i.e. you just need its name), you can use a string mixin. - Jonathan M Davis
