On Saturday, June 30, 2012 21:27:15 Vidar Wahlberg wrote: > On Saturday, 30 June 2012 at 19:06:31 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > > On Saturday, June 30, 2012 21:01:02 Vidar Wahlberg wrote: > >> This is a very good suggestion, I hadn't thought of this > >> possibility, this way I can get my beloved "matrix[x][y];" > >> instead of something like "matrix.get(x, y);". > > > > It might have to be matrix[x, y] though, since while you can > > make opIndex take > > as many arguments as you want, I don't believe that it will let > > you split them > > out into multiple indexing operations like in matrix[x][y]. > > Doh, you are of course correct. That's slightly unfortunate, then > I'm actually leaning a bit more towards creating a "get(x, y)" > method as a "[x, y]" construct would be a bit unusual (at least > for me, for the time being).
I think that there are languages which actually use [x, y] for rectangular arrays, but I haven't used one that does that either. - Jonathan M Davis
