Re: is() and const

[bearophile]

Andrea Fontana:

const(int) : int  <-- true
const(PP) : PP  <-- false
Is this behaviour correct?

I think it's correct, and it's caused by the difference between 
value types and reference types.


And how can I check if T is of a certain class ignoring consts 
(and avoiding double checks)?

There are some different ways to do it, one of them is to use 
something like (untested):

is(Unqual!typeof(x) == PP)

Where Unqual is in Phobos, std.traits.Unqual.

Bye,
bearophile