(Course I could just update what I have for BitArray so it works as a value-type for now too...)
Currently since I've been concentrating more on bitfields and
BitArray needs more work, the two separate patches and trees are
out of sync and apparently the auto-tester brings them up as a
fail. How do I remove one of the pulls so I can concentrate on
the one set of features and continue the others later?
- Re: BitArray/BitFields - Reworki... Philippe Sigaud
- Re: BitArray/BitFields - Reworki... Era Scarecrow
- Re: BitArray/BitFields - Reworki... Philippe Sigaud
- Re: BitArray/BitFields - Reworki... Era Scarecrow
- Re: BitArray/BitFields - Review bearophile
- Re: BitArray/BitFields - Review Era Scarecrow
- Re: BitArray/BitFields - Review bearophile
- Re: BitArray/BitFields - Review Era Scarecrow
- Re: BitArray/BitFields - Review bearophile
- Re: BitArray/BitFields - Review Don Clugston
- Removing a pull... Era Scarecrow
- Re: Removing a pull... David Nadlinger
- Re: Removing a pull... Era Scarecrow
- Re: Removing a pull... Era Scarecrow
- bitfields - 4425 bells & whistles Era Scarecrow
- bitfield - 4935/4937 Allow repeated (identical) bitfield d... Era Scarecrow