On Sunday, 5 August 2012 at 16:42:16 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 5 August 2012 at 16:30:48 UTC, Minas Mina wrote:Thank you. Is it the way it is to have compatibility with C structs?I'm not sure... I think so in part, but I think another part of it is to make sure that struct constructors can't bring a hidden cost to generic code.
I see. Thank you a lot for your help!
