On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Timon Gehr <timon.g...@gmx.ch> wrote:
> Yes, but note that this distinction does not make any sense. > > alias int Int; // works > > isType!Int // 'Int' is clearly a symbol, yet the instantiation fails. > > alias declarations should just accept built-in types. If someone for > some obscure reason needs to exclude them, template constraints are > good enough. There is no reason to make built-in types behave specially > here. Yes, alias has different semantics depending on its use (in template param list or as a statement).
