2012/9/8 Timon Gehr <timon.g...@gmx.ch>: > On 09/08/2012 09:25 PM, Maxim Fomin wrote: >> >> On Saturday, 8 September 2012 at 16:00:44 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote: >>> >>> On 09/08/2012 04:11 PM, Ellery Newcomer wrote: >>>> >>>> alias enum int e; >>> >>> >>> It is valid according to the grammar and DMD ignores meaningless >>> attributes. >>> >>> scope shared @disable @trusted package final override deprecated >>> extern __gshared synchronized pure nothrow ref static abstract >>> immutable alias auto final override deprecated extern __gshared >>> synchronized enum pure nothrow ref static abstract @safe @disable >>> scope int e; >> >> >> How dmd's parser is written if it allows such things? > > > It's the grammar that allows this. Every parser that follows the grammar > would accept this.
Where is this grammar been defined? It looks more like a bug.
