On Monday, September 10, 2012 09:30:59 Jacob Carlborg wrote: > On 2012-09-10 09:24, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > > And it works just fine in D2. It's const that's the problem. In general, > > if you want a member variable to be "read-only" on a struct, I'd strongly > > advise using a getter property without a setter property rather than > > making it const, because const makes it so that stuff like the assignment > > operator doesn't work. > Well, in D1 const was a nice shortcut for this.
Whereas in D2, const is both something of fantastic wonder and utter despair. :) - Jonathan M Davis
