Am Sat, 22 Sep 2012 12:30:30 +0200 schrieb Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com>:
> On 2012-09-22 11:24, Martin Drasar wrote: > > > thanks for the hint. Making it shared sounds a bit fishy to me. My > > intention is to pass some read only data, that are in fact thread > > local and there is no real need to make them shared. > > The whole point of thread local data is that it's only accessible > from a single thread. If you want to share it with another thread you > have, as far as I know, there options: > > 1. Declare it as "shared" There's also __gshared. > 2. Declare it as "immutable" > 3. Make a copy, i.e. serialize the data
