On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:40:04PM +0200, Era Scarecrow wrote: > I'm curious why this would break and not work, as is should compare > against it's location/entity correct? I wonder why it breaks then > for structs on the stack. I can only find 'opIs missing' when > searching for it, so... [...]
Wait, there's such a thing as overloading 'is'? If there is, that's pretty messed up. The 'is' operator is used for a lot of fundamental stuff, and allowing structs and classes to change that just sounds ... wrong. T -- It's amazing how careful choice of punctuation can leave you hanging:
