On 10/16/2012 05:57 PM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
...
At NG discussion it may look nice to define some type and then add
operator overloading methods
Operator overloading is not magic, so your statement can be shortened to
... and then add methods
Which is still not correct, because that is not what UFCS does.
but as soon as you import some other
modules, authors of which also consider UFCS operators a good idea,
Who has stated that? It just does not make sense to explicitly ban
them, as they are not special.
everything breaks including namespace conflict
The usual disambiguation procedures apply. (Which are broken in DMD at
the moment, because module-scope private symbols can cause conflicts.)
Infix operators are not special. It is just notation.
as well as loosing
ability to manipulate that type within built-in expression as well.
I did not get that.
