On 19-10-2012 08:23, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-10-18 20:51, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
I mean, the 'package' access modifier.
So did I.
class Foo
{
package void foo () {}
}
Would, according to the spec, imply a virtual method. But as Jonathan
said, this is a bug in the spec.
What? How is this not an implementation bug? An access modifier
shouldn't have anything to do with whether a method is virtual. If
people want to have a class hierarchy with virtual functions at package
level, let them. This is the most ridiculous arbitrary restriction I
have seen to date. :|
--
Alex Rønne Petersen
a...@lycus.org
http://lycus.org
