On Friday, 9 November 2012 at 17:58:27 UTC, Dan wrote:
I don't think making postblit accept const works - did it for
you? If you just mean "this(const this)" it does make it
compile - but that postblit is not called.
Making parameter to be const solves that problem.
Not to me. Sorry if I'm missing something, but a solution would
be that it not only compile, but it invoke my this(const this)
postblit, which unless I'm missing something it does not.
I understood that the problem is in non-compiling.
Look at this: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/1f60055d. It is a
combination of original code and code above. It fails to
compile, but commenting this(this) makes dmd happy.
Alternatively you can comment S[S[string]] w1, w2 and
everything also works fine.
Look at this: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/95d40612
I commented out this(this) and dmd is happy, but I am not
because nothing is printed. This is quite bad because I think
I'll be duping all my members but it won't get called and
sharing will ensue. What am I missing?
Thanks,
Dan
Well actually this(const this) appears to be not a copy
constructor at all - thanks to treating func(Type) {} as
func(Type _param_0){} it is converted to a regular constructor
which may take arbitrary arguments and is irrelevant here. So,
basically the problem is in:
struct S {
this(this) { }
}
void main() {
S[S[string]] w1,w2;
assert(w1==w2); //template instance error instantiating
}
