On Sunday, January 06, 2013 21:59:32 Andrej Mitrovic wrote: > On 1/6/13, Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > > If you or someone else > > It's going to have to be someone else. When someone asks something on > IRC/NG and another person responds with "it's because it's not a type > constructor", or "it's not a storage class" I get completely thrown > off and don't understand what they mean, exactly because there's no > solid definition in the docs.
Well, I think that we can get a solid definiton for a type qualifier / constructor fairly easily, but storage class is harder, because there really isn't one. - Jonathan M Davis
