Le 15/01/2013 19:41, Ary Borenszweig a écrit :
On Thursday, 10 January 2013 at 17:36:15 UTC, Raphaël Jakse wrote:
Le 10/01/2013 10:23, monarch_dodra a écrit :
On Thursday, 10 January 2013 at 03:29:21 UTC, Peter Summerland wrote:
The only thing I'd want to be able to do is:
//----
foreach ( ; 0 .. 5)
{
writeln("hello");
}
//----
If I don't need a named variable, why force me to define a symbol?
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9009
I know I could just use "i" and move on, but when code starts getting
complex, and you already have i, j, k, ii, dummy etc..., it can make a
difference.
What about :
foreach (0 .. 5)
{
writeln("hello");
}
?
What about:
5 {
writeln("hello");
}
It could even work with floats!
1.5 {
writeln("nice");
}
prints:
nice
ni
D should definitively implement the GWPM (Gess What the Programmer
Meant) compile-time feature. That would be awesome.
