On 02/08/13 01:33, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > Hmmm. I wouldn't have thought that you could get the function pointer at > compiler time. Regardless, you lose any possibility of inlining the function > call, which is the main problem AFAIK, though I don't know if they would have > been an option in the case of dup anyway.
It doesn't affect inlining. (Obviously, that's compiler dependent, but there's no reason why it should and indeed does not w/ gdc) artur
