On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:02:32 Timothee Cour wrote: > how about '&' : > > void fun(int & x); > > which is same as C++ syntax, hence familiar. I thought someone had > proposed that a few weeks ago
That would be a much larger change, and I'd be surprised if Walter or Andrei went for that. Picking an attribute name is much more in line with how we've been doing things. - Jonathan M Davis