On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 10:02:32 Timothee Cour wrote:
> how about '&' :
> 
> void fun(int & x);
> 
> which is same as C++ syntax, hence familiar. I thought someone had
> proposed that a few weeks ago

That would be a much larger change, and I'd be surprised if Walter or Andrei 
went for that. Picking an attribute name is much more in line with how we've 
been doing things.

- Jonathan M Davis

Reply via email to