On Tuesday, 9 April 2013 at 23:18:26 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Tue, 09 Apr 2013 18:53:56 -0400, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
<joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote:
By the way: the reason that I rejected the temporary-variable
choice was that I
couldn't really see the difference cost-wise between doing
that, versus
returning var.dup from front(). Especially as it's not
necessarily guaranteed
that front will be called frequently (I might just popFront()
until the range is
empty and then take the final front value).
Calling front after empty is not good range policy, once empty,
front is possibly invalid or points at invalid memory.
-Steve
I'm pretty sure he realizes this, his original code shows how he
is doing this. He expects 'output' to hold the final front value,
but instead it holds the empty "value."
Joseph, I think you will have to profile to decide which is the
fastest for your use case.
