ping. I've posted a bugzilla entry http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10177 and finally managed to reduce to a small test case.
So will the proposed method improve error reporting? Is there any case where it might hurt? On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Timothee Cour <thelastmamm...@gmail.com>wrote: > In a number of cases I get very large compile error messages after running > rdmd main_module.d > > Upon inspection, running rdmd -v fun.d reveals that the irrelevant error > messages are in different semantic3 passes: > > semantic3 module_with_relevant_error > relevant error (eg: Error: no property 'x' for type 'y') > semantic3 module_with_irrelevant_error > irrelevant error (only coming from the fact that there was an error in a > prior semantic pass) > ... > and the list goes on for large number of lines. > > Why not just start semantic3 passes at 1st error occurence ? > or at least only show those by default? > > in all cases i've encountered all that was needed for me to see was the > 1st faulty semantic3 pass, all other was irrelevant artifacts stemming from > that. > >
