Thanks to all who replied. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:18 PM, bearophile <bearophileh...@lycos.com> wrote: > > But Walter refused them time ago on the basis that no one uses them in C++. > So you can ask for them in the main D newsgroup, but I don't think you will > see them in D...
Um why really? "No one uses them in C++"? How come? I agree that Walter has succesfully produced/marketed a C++ compiler for a long time, but really, "no one uses"?!!! I use, for one. And it does tremendously increase the readability of a program. Otherwise why would there be a separate C header ever since 1990 for that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iso646.h I agree that we should retain the old operators for C compatibility but really at least the basic and/or/not/xor keywords should be provided. -- Shriramana Sharma ஶ்ரீரமணஶர்மா श्रीरमणशर्मा
