On Monday, 8 July 2013 at 09:55:29 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 8 July 2013 at 09:52:44 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
Most other solutions I tried failed because the compiler
evaluates the check (e.g. out contracts) in the interface,
which makes the check either semantically wrong, or statically
false/failed.
Woops, should be "the contract exists in the scope of the
interface", not "the compiler evaluates the check (e.g. out
contracts) in the interface"
Hopefully there is a cleaner way but this beats nothing... thanks.
