On Sunday, 25 August 2013 at 02:24:30 UTC, maarten van damme
wrote:
hello,
I'm a hobyist-programmer and around where I live there's a
group of haskell
fanatics. They posted solutions to a recent programming
challenge which I
find to be a bit ugly. For fun I wanted to implement it in d
and a rough
version (not correct yet, this was written/hacked in 5 minutes
after
reading the exercise)
My rough version is posted here : http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/4b5a6578
if you look at the output, you'll see this particular line :
"omkom -> komkom because of : kom momkom momkom -> momkomm"
This is because of what remove from std.algorithm does. It not
only returns
a range with that element removed (as the name implies), it
also modifies
the original range.
I assume this decision was made for efficiency purposes but
that is one of
the most ugliest things I have ever come across. At least c#
forces the
'ref' in it's parameters so you know something's up. Is there
any way I
could've known this? (apart from reading the documentation on
every single
trivial function in the std library?)
It was done that way intentionally because the purpose of remove
is to remove from the source range. If you don't want to affect
the source range use filter.
I suspect you could trace remove's lineage back to C++ STL's
remove which works similarly (but is significantly clunkier and
harder to use).