On Sunday, 25 August 2013 at 02:24:30 UTC, maarten van damme wrote:
hello,

I'm a hobyist-programmer and around where I live there's a group of haskell fanatics. They posted solutions to a recent programming challenge which I find to be a bit ugly. For fun I wanted to implement it in d and a rough version (not correct yet, this was written/hacked in 5 minutes after
reading the exercise)

My rough version is posted here : http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/4b5a6578

if you look at the output, you'll see this particular line :
"omkom -> komkom because of : kom momkom momkom -> momkomm"

This is because of what remove from std.algorithm does. It not only returns a range with that element removed (as the name implies), it also modifies
the original range.
I assume this decision was made for efficiency purposes but that is one of the most ugliest things I have ever come across. At least c# forces the 'ref' in it's parameters so you know something's up. Is there any way I could've known this? (apart from reading the documentation on every single
trivial function in the std library?)

It was done that way intentionally because the purpose of remove is to remove from the source range. If you don't want to affect the source range use filter.

I suspect you could trace remove's lineage back to C++ STL's remove which works similarly (but is significantly clunkier and harder to use).

Reply via email to