27-Aug-2013 23:31, H. S. Teoh пишет:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:18:50PM +0400, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
27-Aug-2013 18:41, H. S. Teoh пишет:
[snip]
I'm not sure if dmd does that optimization. If you really feel
inclined, you could do static if (X86) and throw in an asm block (but
that would break purity, @safety, etc., so probably not a good idea).
It would be awesome to have pure D analogs for memchr, memcpy and its
ilk that won't be so limiting (as in types used) but would guarantee
top performance.
[...]
Those would have to be compiler intrinsics, since they are CPU-dependent
optimizations. Plus they could improve dmd code generation. :)
It would be golden to finally see a time where compilers have D-specific
intrinsics! :)
--
Dmitry Olshansky
