On Wednesday, 18 September 2013 at 09:09:29 UTC, mrd wrote:
On Wednesday, 18 September 2013 at 09:07:09 UTC, mrd wrote:Looks like data corruption.
I can not imagine what corruption was going on here: the fact that is contract gets the correct value, but the function itself - not. But they both should use same value source, yep?
Can't help you much without a full piece of code that *reproduces* the issue (reducing it helps too).
