On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com>wrote: > > > I always do the cast, though honestly, I think that character literals > should > default to dchar rather than char. I'm not sure that we could ever talk > Walter > into that though, particularly if he thought that doing so would break code > (I'm not sure whether it would or not, but using char for a character is > almost always a bad idea, so defaulting to char for character literals just > doesn't make sense to me). > > I'm not aware of there being a shorter way to get character literal to be > dchar, though I suppose that if you had to do it a lot, you could create a > function with a short name. e.g.
OK, thanks. I'll go with the cast, as this way anyone reading the code will be clear on what is happening there. And I agree with you than character literals should default to dchar. It's a perpetual source of friction for me.
