On Wednesday, 1 January 2014 at 12:09:40 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2014-01-01 01:52, Frustrated wrote:
Is there an easy way to implement properties of an interface
within a
class instead of having to duplicate almost the exact same
code with
generic properties?
interface A
{
@property int data();
@property int data(int value);
}
class B : A
{
@property int data() { return m_data; } // read property
@property int data(int value) { return m_data = value; } //
write
property
}
You can't use an abstract class?
Yes this is the ideal time to use an abstract base class and is
what i would do.
The same thing *could* be achieved using mixin templates, with or
without scopes but could lead to unmaintainable code. See the
examples on mixin templates here:
http://nomad.so/2013/07/templates-in-d-explained/
