On 01/03/2014 04:39 PM, bearophile wrote:
Ali Çehreli:
I still like that solution. :) Even if it's not spelled out to be
correct in the spec, I can't imagine a hash table implementation where
byKey and byValue don't iterate in lock step.
But in the long term ignoring what's present or missing in the specs is
a bad idea.
I don't mean to ignore. I would like to see the spec changed. This feels
similar to first C++ standard never explicitly requiring that the
elements of a string be contiguous in memory but every implementation
doing so.
I wrote the following Expander range as an exercise.
See also:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5489
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7957
Bye,
bearophile
They make sense to me.
Ali
