On 2014-01-17 22:14, H. S. Teoh wrote:

Is that because D doesn't have implicit casting via opCast? -- because,
conceivably, if

        x = d.abc;
        
gets lowered to

        x = d.opCast!(typeof(x))(d.abc);
        
then the above can be made to work.

I don't know, maybe.

--
/Jacob Carlborg

Reply via email to