On Saturday, 22 February 2014 at 22:42:24 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
The problem isn't about optional parenthesis or properties. It's the fact that you can redefine a symbol to be something entierly different, and that this difference will only be seen if you are looking at the symbol through theYou are right. I thought that if we had forced parenthesis, the compiler would at least be able to understand what symbol you were referring to, but this is actually not the case."correct" type.
