On Tuesday, 25 March 2014 at 12:30:37 UTC, Jay Norwood wrote:
These are times on ubuntu. printDiamond3 was slower than
printDiamond.
Hum... Too bad :/
I was able to improve my first "printDiamon" by having a single
slice that contains spaces then stars, and make writeln's of that.
It gave (on my windows) speeds comparable to your printDiamond3.
But not any speed differences that warrants posting new code.
Thanks for the benches. This was fun :)
I love how D can achieve *great* performance, while still looking
readable and maintainable.
