On Friday, 28 March 2014 at 21:10:39 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 03/28/2014 12:03 PM, "Marc Schütz" <[email protected]>" wrote:> destruction happens in reverse lexical order of declaration, > and arrays are destroyed from back to front. > > Is this behaviour guaranteed?It must be that way because later objects can hold references to earlier objects.
That's actually why I was asking :-) Thanks to both of you!
