On Tuesday, 15 April 2014 at 12:05:09 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote:
He obviously meant that you can't get a pointer to the object, that the> reference points to, just by casting and w/o address-of.
Yea, you can cast a class reference to void* (which does include this inside a class), but not a ref storage class thingy which includes this inside a struct. Since the topic at hand was a struct I got a bit sloppy in my wording. So I'd say we're all partially right, just in different contexts :)
