On 06/17/2014 11:17 AM, George Sapkin wrote:
On Tuesday, 17 June 2014 at 17:18:36 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
Shared data can be accessed by more than one thread. Unless it is
locked, other threads may see the array in an inconsistent state.
Ali
But that's a local copy of it, no? If it's not, will making a local copy
solve this?
The original question still stands: how can I resolve this in 2.065?
Thanks.
As long as you know that no other thread can access the data as its
being mutated, then that's fine.
There are other cases where 'shared' has to be casted-away at least for now.
Ali
