On Friday, 8 August 2014 at 17:44:29 UTC, anonymous wrote:
On Friday, 8 August 2014 at 17:07:37 UTC, seany wrote:
And as discussed earlier, I was trying to save the pointers in an ulong (which is same as size_t or ptr_t, those are aliased)

(when compiling for x86-64 that is)

Generally, casting pointers to size_t is a horrible idea. Why
can't you at least go with void*?


I am very confused. Void* magically sorted a lot of problems out. Why are void pointers better than ulong, if I may ask (yes, I am on a x86-64)

Reply via email to