On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:02:01 +0000
Sean Kelly via Digitalmars-d-learn <digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com>
wrote:

> ... and potentially quite broken.  At the very least, if this 
> value is ready anywhere you'll have to use an atomicLoad there in 
> place of the synchronized block you would have used.
sure, *any* access to shared variables should be done with atomic ops.
i thought that this is obvious. ;-)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to