On Saturday, 23 August 2014 at 10:29:04 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 10:19:58 +0000
nikki via Digitalmars-d-learn
<digitalmars-d-learn@puremagic.com> wrote:
don't use '==' to check for nulls. the right way is:
if (foo is null) {}
if (bar !is null) {}
'==' transforms to opEquals call (see 'operator overloading')
and 'is'
not.
as for 'best practice' question -- it depends of many things.
;-)
A good to know! thanks.
I'd still be interrested to see the idiomatic D version of that
function, what would that depend on ?
