I've looked extensively through the code inside the engine and even made a few modifications on it/benchmarked it for weeks and I still can't see why it would be wrong. Wouldn't it help avoid collections and make a good hybrid of manual management/collected code? The free lists in the GC engine look quite convenient to use. Any ideas?
People have been saying for quite a long time not to use the `delete`
keyword on GC-allocated pointers.
- Using the delete Keyword /w GC Etienne via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Using the delete Keyword... Brad Anderson via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Using the delete Key... Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-learn
- Re: Using the delete Keyword... Baz via Digitalmars-d-learn