On 9/25/14 5:47 AM, monarch_dodra wrote:
I was playing around with how T.init works. And I think I may have found
a type loophole.

Given that you may initialize a pointer member to the address to a
static global:

//----
__gshared int a = 0;
struct S
{
     int* p = &a;
}
//----

Then, in theory, any variable, be they mutable or const, are initialized
to T.init:

//----
void main()
{
     immutable S s;
}
//----

This is an issue, because I now have an immutable pointer that points to
mutable data:
//----
     immutable S s = S.init;
     immutable int* p = s.p;
     assert(*p == 0); //OK
     a = 5;
     assert(*p == 5); //OK
//----

So this violates the type system...

The question here is:
Is this "legit" code? At what point do you think my code should have
been rejected?

It should be rejected. The declaration of s (the variable) should be the trigger, since it casts the pointer to immutable.

Please file a bug report.

-Steve

Reply via email to