On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 08:28:49AM +0200, Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > On 06/10/14 19:48, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: > > >This looks wrong to me. Are you sure this finds *all* possible > >graphemes? > > No, the data I gave was to detect a complete code unit. Graphemes are > something else, I think Uranuz is mixing up the Unicode terms. [...]
Ahhh, OK, then it makes sense. T -- People who are more than casually interested in computers should have at least some idea of what the underlying hardware is like. Otherwise the programs they write will be pretty weird. -- D. Knuth
