On Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:49:20 +0100, eles <e...@eles.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, 22 October 2014 at 15:45:02 UTC, eles wrote:

D version with structs:

        { //display ~C~B~A
            A foo;
            B bar;
            C *caz = new C();
            delete caz;
        }

as expected.

Structs are special, compare:
http://dlang.org/struct.html#struct-destructor

with:
http://dlang.org/class.html#destructors

Specifically:
"The garbage collector is not guaranteed to run the destructor for all unreferenced objects. Furthermore, the order in which the garbage collector calls destructors for unreference objects is not specified. This means that when the garbage collector calls a destructor for an object of a class that has members that are references to garbage collected objects, those references may no longer be valid. This means that destructors cannot reference sub objects. This rule does not apply to auto objects or objects deleted with the DeleteExpression, as the destructor is not being run by the garbage collector, meaning all references are valid."

Regan

--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

Reply via email to