On Wednesday, 12 November 2014 at 08:02:06 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d-learn wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 04:56:39 +0000
Casey via Digitalmars-d-learn
<[email protected]> wrote:
D has nothing to do with your task, WinAPI does. and you'll
need alot
of expirience in reverse engineering, 'cause f... punkbuster
shits it's
pants almost for anything. it's a rootkit, and very badly
written one.
what you have to do is to fight with rootkit, making it think
that it
is still functional. so learn assembler, x86 archtecture,
winapi,
windows driver development, nt kernel internals and so on.
and don't even dream that it will be portable.
I don't need to do this I'm pretty sure... I just need to write
something that will send the chat messages as described in my
first post. I don't need to rootkit PunkBuster, it's not trying
to ban programs that send chat messages.... It's simply trying
to ban macro programs like AutoHotKey. AHK can be used to make
no recoil scripts, so they added an option so that server owners
can choose to kick those players /if they want to/.
Again, I'm writing a simple program to send chat messages at a
lowish level once a hotkey/keybind has been pressed. All it
needs is to add a delay in between the chat key presses (Like
*chat key* down, then 1 ms later, chat key up)(Forgot to mention
that last night), typing my actual message as quickly as
possible, then to send the message.
In other words, it needs to recignise my keybind, press the chat
button down, then up with a small delay in between, send my
message and press enter.
PB nor any other program should find this as a cheating program.
It's not a cheat at all. It's not a mod, hack, nor advantage
that others can't do. It's not unfair, it's not too good, it's
just something simple that I'm trying to make work. It doesn't
need a GUI, it just needs what I've described above. No
rootkits, nothing like that afaik. If it's not a hack/cheat, PB
isn't going to look at it like it is one (hopefully).
Thank you for your interest and reply.
