I'm assuming the answer is yes.

If so, that implies that I could execute a function pointer that doesn't point to anything meaningful. Conversely, functionality could exist that I can't get access to because my function pointer is unavailable?

If these are dangers, is there a technique or mechanism that I can use to always ensure that both these scenarios never happen.

Andrei's book mentions that reference types live forever (or something to that effect) as opposed to value types. So could I put functions and function pointers into Class objects?

Thanks.

Reply via email to