On 12/16/14 10:33 AM, Tobias Pankrath wrote:
so it will be documented? that was the rhetorical question.
Does it need to be? I don't see a reason for anyone to go out of their
way to make the implementation inconsistent. Do you?
At least I would prefer not to rely on undefined behaviour. If we ever
do change the AA implementation in an inconsistent way, it will at least
prevent the "but this code was broken all along"-argument.
On the other hand adding just one sentence to the documentation would
cost us nothing.
I can never ever see a reason to implement 2 different ways to traverse
the elements, just to piss off people?
If you make a PR that adds that to documentation, I will pull it if it
makes you feel better. I don't think it hurts, but don't think it's
worth my time to make such a PR.
-Steve
